2022-Jan-23 How Covid Shots Supress Your Immune System by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D 1h 21m 41s
Video Watch & Download .......... Audio Listen & Download
Research paper authored by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D, Peter McCullough, M.D., and doctors Greg Nigh,Anthony M. Kyriakopoulos.
Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations:
The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
This research paper is aimed at those less challenged by the topics of immunity, microbiology and vaccination effects on the human body. It is in the preliminary stage of publication. However, due to the delicate nature of its topic, as generally covered in the video above, it may well be attacked by the censor warriors and may not receive formal recognition through a peer reviewed scientific journal. That is one of the handicaps facing medical and scientific research publications in the last 25 years - research articles which dare to deviate from the current established naratives often set by commercial interests which are at variance with the actual welfare considerations of the general public. Therefore, the paper, which is about 21 pages of research article content in length, and 215 cited references can be downloaded from this site and also from the link given above.
Because of true humanitarians such as Drs Stephanie Seneff, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Joseph Mercola, Geert V. Bossche, Judy Mikovits, Michael Yeadon, Richard Fleming, David Martin, Vladimir Zelenko, Reiner Fuellmich, Pierre Kory, Peter Weinstein and medical philantrophist Steve Kirsch, the public is able to learn the "other side" of the issues involved in this mass vaccination program, world wide, using an untested experimental gene altering "vaccine". These dedicated servants of the people provide critical information that form the necessary "informed consent" which is otherwise kept from the people. Those who are able are urged to provide what support they can to these true professionals - that they may carry on the good work. If it were not people such as listed above (and they are only a small sample) you and I, the general public, would be totally IN THE DARK on the whole question of the dangers and significant risks that appear to be associated with the "vaccines". Let our thanks be practical when possible.
thevaccine.net
The full title is:
Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations - The Role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
Open and Download Research Paper by Drs Stephanie Seneff, Peter McCullough, et.al.,
January 21, 2022
Abstract
The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease had no precedent, but desperate times seemed to call for desperate measures. The mRNA vaccines utilize genetically modified mRNA encoding spike proteins. These alterations hide the mRNA from cellular defenses, promote a longer biological half-life for the proteins, and provoke higher overall spike protein production. However, both experimental and observational evidence reveals a very different immune response to the vaccines compared to the response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. As we will show, the genetic modifications introduced by the vaccine are likely the source of these differential responses. In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Introduction
2. Interferons: An Overview with Attention to Cancer Surveillance
3. Considerations in the Design of mRNA Vaccines
4. GC enrichment and potential G4 (pG4) structures in vaccine mRNAs
5. Type I IFNs and COVID-19
6. Are the methylation strategies for cellular housekeeping generally omitted by vaccine mRNAs?
7. Exosomes and MicroRNAs
8. Reactivation of Varicella-zoster
9. Impaired DNA Repair and Adaptive Immunity
10. Immune Thrombocytopenia
11. ΠΠΑΡ-α, Συλφατιδε ανδ Λιvερ Δισεασε
12. Guillain Barr´e Syndrome and Other Neurological Conditions
13. Bell's Palsy
14. Myocarditis
15. Considerations Regarding the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
15.1 VAERS Signal for Immune Suppression, Thrombocytopenia and Neurodegeneration
Table 1.
15.2 VAERS Signal for Cancer
16. Discussion
17. Conclusions
References 1 thru 215
Conclusions
17. Conclusions It is imperative that worldwide administration of the mRNA vaccinations be stopped immediately until further studies are conducted to determine the extent of the potential pathological consequences outlined in this paper. It is not possible for these vaccinations to be considered part of a public health campaign without a detailed analysis of the human impact of the potential collateral damage. It is also imperative that VAERS and other monitoring system be optimized to detect signals related to the health consequences of mRNA vaccination we have outlined. We believe the upgraded VAERS monitoring system described in the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study, but unfortunately not supported by the CDC, would be a valuable start in this regard [208]. In the end, we are not exaggerating to say that billions of lives are at stake. We call on the public health institutions to demonstrate, with evidence, why the issues discussed in this paper are not relevant to public health, or to acknowledge that they are and to act accordingly. Until our public health institutions do what is right in this regard, we encourage all individuals to make their own health care decisions with this information as a contributing factor in those decisions.