"To sin by silence when they should protest -

makes cowards of men"

by Ella Wheeler Wilcox, (Nov. 5, 1850 - Oct. 30, 1919) 1914 from her poem, "The Protest"

 

Posted 2022-January-22

2022-January-29, Saturday. Update on Comments

I have read the "indictment." It seems to me that Dr. Reiner Fuellmich whole case is pure circumstantial and I do not believe he could win in a criminal court in the United States. Conspiracy cases are always very difficult to prove. "Grand Conspiracy" theories are even harder. And Global-Universal Conspiracy theories are almost impossible to prove. Thus they remain viable material over the centuries for those who tend to find a certain amount of comfort entertaining conspiracy as it allows their immagination to run wild as it wishes without harming others too much. I am not saying that I don't believe that conspiracies do come together, that some truly do happen.

One of the key considerations in Drs. Fuellmich and Yeadon's argument supporting their conspiracy is the whole matter of the "batch" numbers, where some vial batches seemed to show a statistical significant difference which correlated with a statistical significant death rate following administrations.  I will hunt up an article by Karl Denninger, whose website, Market-Ticker.org has over 400,000 weekly viewers. The articles addressed the very issue that Drs Fuellmich and Yeadon think create a strong prima facie case for pre-meditated murder on the part of Pfizer and Moderna, et.al., Karl Denninger has his faults with his use of explitives in abundance but in the years since this covid affair began he has seen farther than anyone else and I have to say - he has not yet been wrong.  He is a wealthy retired high-tech business man who also has a mastery of statistical tools. 

Using the search engine in Market-Ticker.org I found the article I was looking for that specifically addresses what Drs Fuellmich and Yeadon were talking about as regarding lot numbers, etc. but this article by Karl Denninger goes very deep into the statistical aspect.

Market-Ticker Karl Denninger article is approximately 22 pages and filled with statistical analysis much of which I don't follow. But many of you will understand it fully. Here Beginning with the bottom part of page 20 here are Karl's concluding remarks:

Enter this link to go exactly to the article with Karl Denninger's analysis

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3731234

 

What do we have here folks?
Is there something inherent in the production of the "instructions", however they're delivered, that results in a non-deterministic outcome within a batch of jabs which was not controlled for, perhaps because it isn't understood SINCE WE HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BEFORE IN MAN OR BEAST and if it goes wrong you're ****ed?
This is a power-law (exponential) distribution; it is not a step-function nor normally or evenly distributed.  Those don't happen with allegedly consistent manufacturing processes and the potential confounding factor that could be an innocent explanation (all the bad ones were early and killed all the old people early who died of "something" but it wasn't the vaccines since they all got the jab first) has been invalidated because the dates of death are in fact reasonably distributed.
Have doctors been told to stop reporting?  Note that HHS can issue such an order under the PREP Act and there is no judicial review if they do that.  Did they?
This demands an explanation.  Three different firms all using spike proteins, two using a different technology than the third, all three causing the body to produce the spike rather than deliver it directly and all three of them have a wild skew of some lots that hose people left and right while the others, statistically, do not screw people.
This data also eliminates the hypothesis put forward that lack of aspiration technique is responsible -- that is, that occasional accidental penetration of a vein results in systemic distribution.  That would not be lot-specific.
Next question, which VAERS cannot answer: Is there an effectiveness difference between the lots that screw people and those that do not?
Are we done being stupid yet?  Statistically all of the adverse events of any sort are in a handful of lots irrespective of the brand.  The rest generate a few bad outcomes while a very, very small number of lots generate a huge percentage of the harm.  And no, that's not tied to age bracketing (therefore who got it first either); some of the worst have average age distributions that are less than lots with lower adverse event rates.  It is also not tied to when used either since one of the "better" lots has a first-AE report right at the start of January -- as do the "bad" lots.
The only thing all three of these vaccines have in common is that all three of them rely on the human body to produce the spike protein that is then attacked by the immune system and produces antibodies; none of them directly introduce the offending substance into the body.  The mechanism of induction is different between the J&J and Pfizer/Moderna formulations but all exhibit the same problem.  The differential shown in the data is wildly beyond reasonable explanation related to the cohort dosed and the reported person's average age for the full set of events (not just deaths) does not correlate with elevated risk in a given lot either so it is clearly not related to the age of the person jabbed (e.g. "certain lots all went to nursing homes since they were first.")  While the highest AE rate lots all have early use dates so do some of the low-AE rate lots so the attempt to explain the data away as "but the highest risk got it first" fails as well.
In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale.  This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirus jab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be "hot" and harm crazy percentages of those they're given to with no way to know in advance.  The basic premise used here -- to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure. 
The entire premise of calling something that does this a "vaccine" is bogus and in the context of a coronavirus this may never be able to be done safely.
Something is very wrong here folks and the people running VAERS either aren't looking on purpose, know damn well its happening and are saying nothing about it on purpose -- never mind segregating the data in such a fashion that casual perusal of their downloads won't find it -- or saw it immediately and suppressed reporting on purpose.
If these firms were not immune from civil and even criminal prosecution as a result of what Biden and Trump did the plaintiff's bar would have been crawling up *******s months ago.
This ought to be rammed up every politician's ass along with every single person at the CDC, NIH and FDA.  They know this is going on; it took me minutes to analyze and find this.
What the HELL is going on here?
THESE SHOTS MUST BE WITHDRAWN NOW until what has happened is fully explained and, if applicable, accountability is obtained for those injured or killed as a result.  If embargoing of reports is proved, and its entirely possible that is the case, everyone involved must go to prison now and the entire program must be permanently scrapped.
THERE IS NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION FOR THIS DATA THAT REDUCES TO RANDOM CHANCE.

To View the entire market-ticker.org article 3731234 on this website format   JMP_TO_HERE

To View the entire market-ticker.org article 3731234 in its original unvarnished state  JMP_TO_HERE

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3731234

To Return to thevaccine.net home page GoLink

Return to Home Page

Key Web Pages & Documents

International_Court_of_Justice_Indictment_1.html  Lays out the case. Entire 48 page indictment with documents.

drreinerfuellmichnurembergcasetranscript.html   Transcript of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Summary of his legal case, Crimes Against Humanity, Second Nuremberg Tribune. Rev.0  [This is a transcript of a 47 minute audio. The initial draft is computer generated. Pehaps later it can be fine tuned.

Dr. Fuellmich Interviews Dr. Peter McCullough

MD & Cardiologist & Prof. of Medicine

2022-Jan-22 Saturday, Will These People Be Charged With Genocide, mercola
Published 2022-January-22 by Dr. Joseph Mercola, DO (www.mercola.com)

 

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, (JD) Attorney at Law, California and W. Germany

Household names are being taken to the International Criminal Court for taking part in the greatest genocidal hoax in history. With this new 'premeditation data,' there's now enough evidence to destroy the entire vaccine industry.

Key Web Pages & Documents

International_Court_of_Justice_Indictment_1.html  Lays out the case. Entire 48 page indictment with documents.

drreinerfuellmichnurembergcasetranscript.html   Transcript of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Summary of his legal case, Crimes Against Humanity, Second Nuremberg Tribune. Rev.0  [This is a transcript of a 47 minute audio. The initial draft is computer generated. Pehaps later it can be fine tuned.

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

2022-Jan-22 Saturday, Will These People Be Charged With Genocide, mercola
Published 2022-January-22 by Dr. Joseph Mercola, DO (www.mercola.com)

• Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression

• The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum

• According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute

• The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the "Doctors Trial" in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects

• The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court

According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:1

"In a stunning 46-page legal filing2 to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53."

The Dirty 16

In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:

1. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID

2. Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance

3. Bill Gates

4. Melinda Gates

5. Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer

6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna

7. Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca

8. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson

9. Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO

10. Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister

11. Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser

12. Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care

13. Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care

14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products

15. Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation

16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum

The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are "the peoples of the United Kingdom." One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.

At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.

"I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation," he said in a "Planet Lockdown" interview published in late April 2021.3

What Is the International Criminal Court?

The International Criminal Court4,5 (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S.

The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that doesn't always happen.

If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in question from criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint:6

"We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.

The statute for the ICC declares that 'The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly."

Still, the ICC relies on the states' national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court's ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the "Doctors Trial" in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects.7

Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians to "act in the patient's best interest when providing medical care."

While not a binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom and principles of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.

Violation 2 — Genocide

Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:

• Killing

• Causing serious bodily or mental harm

• Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility

• Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction
All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to "conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction," this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns, and damaging people's immune systems through the refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates and coercing people to take the COVID jab.

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity

Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes:

The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support them.

Violation 4 — War Crimes

War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that "a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy 'vaccines." They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that:

"... the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA 'vaccines.'

We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes."

War crimes listed in the complaint include:


Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression

The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:

"This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that 'the plan' involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions.

It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; 'BUILD BACK BETTER,' used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN 's Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction."

New Findings Will 'Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry'

In a January 1, 2022, video announcement (featured at the top of this article), Dr. Reiner Fuellmich8 — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and cofounder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss)9,10,11 launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is "enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry."

Fuellmich is heading up the committee's corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public.

According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.

There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation. ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have "hard evidence" of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.12

In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some having a toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have a toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths attributed to them.

Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their experimentation, so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they're all doing this. They're all experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they're able to do this is because there are no review boards overseeing any of them.

There's now an interesting site where you can search the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data based on your lot number, to see if you got one of the more dangerous batches. You can find that dashboard here.13 The video below explains how to use the dashboard.


"There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation," Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.

Without doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn't mean we don't try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health and our children's futures.

 

 

 

Posted 2021-08-05, Thursday

My God, What Have We Done!

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Attorney at Law, Californina & Germany

Pending Class Action Case, Crimes Against Humanity

Second Nuremberg Tribune

Video - Full 49 minutes

Audio - Full 49 minutes

Video - First Twenty Five Minutes - Start to 25 min

Video - Second Twenty Four Minutes - start at 24 min to end

Audio - First Twenty Five Minutes

Audio - Second Twenty Four Minutes to end

Transcript on Webpage

Transcript pdf

Transcript MS Word

Approximately 100 lawyers (as of April 10, 2020) are involved with this world wide effort. Dr. Reiner is the lead attorney. More later to come to clarify totals and history of the organization and a list with short bios of key scientists in the medical field, including at least one Nobel Laureate and professor in medicine, and various professors and scientists in major universities throughout the world.

Remember, the transcript is initial computer translation from the audio and is Rev0 to be updated later.